|
FROM:
REVIS:: (email)
for
your arsenal, below are some email remarks from a machinist friend of mine
who used to work at CalTech making
custom machinery and models for them. He got to know some of the
scientists, and a dialogue with one is below.
First
his own observations:
Some thoughts on
the 30th.Anniversary of the "Moon landing"
1. Above 200 to
300 miles altitude, the Radiation of X-Rays, Gamma Rays, and Cosmic Rays
are deadly to any and all living organisms. We are protected here on
Earth, by the Van Allen Belts (180 -300 miles altitude), and the
atmosphere surrounding the earth. The reason the temperatures at the
equator are so much hotter, and almost unbearable at105-120 degrees F, is
that the sun's Radiation has less atmosphere to penetrate.
2. The direct
sunlight radiation on the Moon's surface without any atmosphere whatsoever
ranges between 265 degrees to 300 degrees F., far above the boiling
temperature of water here on earth, (with atmospheric pressure of 15 lbs.
per square inch). The absence of any atmosphere leaves EVERYTHING subject
to deadly Solar radiation, X-Rays, Gamma Rays, Cosmic Rays, and Solar
flares. It is a very, very in-hospitable place, to say the least. Even
short duration exposure to the deadly radiation would result in Cancer,
Leukemia, and Death.
3. The space
around the Moon is a total vacuum. In a vacuum, the so-called
air-conditioning units worn as "backpacks" by the Astro-NOTS had
NO WAY TO CONDUCT THE HEAT AWAY. Remember, the radiated surface heat of an
object in direct sunlight on the surface of the Moon is 265 to 300 degrees
F. A vacuum is a PERFECT INSULATOR. Heat (molecular motion) must be
conducted by molecular motion, transferred from one medium to another
medium, for heating or cooling of any kind to be effected.
An example is the familiar automobile cooling system:
The heat generated within the engine is conducted into water
circulating within the engine block;
The hot water is pumped from the engine block, into the radiator;
The heat from the water is conducted into the coils and fins of the
radiator;
The heat (molecular motion) is transferred to the air passing over
coils and fins;
The heat LEAVES the engine in form of heated air moving into the
outside atmosphere;
The water, now holding less heat (cooler) is returned back into the
engine block;
The cycle is continuous, repeating transfer of heat from the engine
block to the outside air.
If the automobile
radiator was placed in a vacuum chamber, no convection could take place
from the fins to the air (because there would be no air molecules to
EFFECT A TRANSFER of heat away from the radiator); the heat would keep
increasing, until the entire water system boiled away, then engine heat
would keep rising until the engine self destructed, burning itself up.
On the
"Moon", the entire CLOSED SYSTEM of the "air-conditioning
backpack" and the Astro-NOT inside the suit, were ALL "WITHIN A
TOTAL, COMPLETE VACUUM". They would have cooked like a burritos in a
microwave oven! Ole'.. WHERE DID THE HEAT GO, NASA?
(Or has NASA
discovered a NEW PHYSICAL LAW of thermodynamics, and just forgot to tell
the rest of the world?)
4. The
"Spacesuits" were supposedly pressurized to 5 p.s.i.. At that
pressure, the gloves which were integral with the arms of the suits worn
by the Astro-Nots would be practically immovable in the fingers. The
pictures and film released by NASA shows the men working with the gloves
freely moving their fingers and grasping objects with NO DIFFICULTY
WHATSOEVER, and apparently no pressure in the gloves!
5. The entrance
and exit hatch on the Lunar landing module is dimensionally to small for
any Astro-Not to have climbed out of with the bulky suit on. Maybe that is
why there are NO PICTURES OF ANYONE EXITING THE TOO SMALL HATCH! When
investigators tried to get copies of the original construction drawings of
the Lander Module from Grumman Aircraft Corp., of Beth Page New York, they
were told that all of the drawings have been destroyed! (Isn't that
convenient!) No further detailed analysis can made. The Lander simulator
is on view at the Smithsonian Museum. Many areas in the two craft differ
from pictures.
6. The Astro-Nots
carried standard Hasselblad cameras, fastened to their suit front,
supposedly to take the many still photos. According to Kodak Corp., who
made the film used in the Moon Landing expeditions, the film melts above
150 degrees F. The camers were not "air-conditioned" with the
new "thermodynamics discovery laws" that the NASA seems to have
access to!
(How did NASA get
the film to withstand the incredible heat, hereto-fore unknown in
photography? Maybe they have discovered another law of thermodynamics that
is being kept a secret!)
7. The shadows of
objects in pictures published by NASA had widely different angles, within
the same picture. If the light source was the SUN, all shadows should have
been parallel, and also indicating the identical angle of elevation.
Surprisingly, some pictures showed different shadow angles, sometimes as
much as four or five different light source origins. The picture of
Armstrong and Aldrin placing the American flag have radically different
shadow lengths, indicating two separate light sources, with resultant
different angles of elevation to the light source, most certainly not the
SUN!
(staged, movie set
lighting??)
8. The angles of
elevation of the sun, from the surface of the Moon can be KNOWN for any
date, relative to any location on the Moon's surface by the principles of
Astronomy and spherical geometry. This embodies the mathematics of
Astronomy, and Navigation, which has been perfected during the last two
hundred years. The angles of elevation to the Sun, from measurements taken
of shadows seen in photographs published by NASA do not agree with
calculated actual Sun angles of elevation for the time periods of the
published excursions. The only explanation is that the light source in
NASA photographs is NOT THE SUN!
(Another case of
staged, movie set lighting??)
9. No picture of
the Moon's surface, published by NASA, shows any stars in the sky. The
"NO ATMOSPHERE" of the surface of the moon, would have been a
literally breathtaking sky-view, with MORE stars visible than any living
man has EVER SEEN on the earth. Not only would it show in every Moon photo
with the horizon and sky in the background, but the Astro-Nots themselves
would have been commenting frequently in amazement, and been in absolute
awe.
NOT ONE SINGLE
COMMENT FROM ANY ASTRO-NOT of the stunning sky and view of the Heavens
above!
NOT ONE SINGLE
STAR IN ANY PHOTO!
If NASA had
decided to put stars or constellations in the "FAKE" sky on
their movie set, it wouldn't have take too long for some very clever
Astronomers to take the published "Moon landing" dates, done
some angle of elevation calculations, and discovered incontrovertible
evidence of fraud, because star placement would be either exactly right
(which would be so if all photographs were taken on the Moon), or very,
very wrong. Star and Planet positions in the heavens are a fixed, and
immovable landmark in the sky. So, NASA choose to have a sky with NOTHING
WHATSOEVER IN IT, and avoid the chance of being caught with their
"pants down"!
(Have you ever
been on a camping trip, away from the city lights and atmospheric
pollution, and been amazed at the awsome number of stars visible in the
night sky?)
10. The one most
spectacular, single sight which could EVER BE SEEN by any human in history
would be a view of the Earth while standing on the Moon, with the most
incredible array of stars and planets ever seen, surrounding the view of
Earth. The Earth is approximately fifteen times larger than the Moon, and
is bathed in an ever changing myriad of clouds, intense blue oceans,
colored land masses, and dramatic lightening flashes arcing beneath the
clouds, revealing a startling display, as has been photographed from
orbiting space craft about 180 miles above the Earth.
NOT ONE COMMENT BY ANY ASTRO-NOT.
NOT ONE REMARK FROM ANY ASTRO-NOT.
NOT ONE WORD FROM ANY ASTRO-NOT,
ON ANY MOON MISSION,
ABOUT THE EARTH, AT ANY TIME.
NONE! NOT ONE!
NOT ONE PHOTO OF THE EARTH FROM THE MOON PUBLISHED.
Should we even ask, WHY NOT?
(Because the
Astro-Nots weren't on the Moon. They were somewhere in the Nevada desert,
and such commentary was not in the script!)
11. The soil
beneath the Lunar Lander was undisturbed in the published NASA
photographs. The Lander supposedly used a powerful rocket engine blasting
downwards to prevent the whole module from crashing into the surface. The
sustained, many, many seconds long rocket blast of literally THOUSANDS
UPON THOUSANDS of pounds of FORCE, as the module slowly lowered itself to
the soft, rocky soil surface of the Moon, would have sent huge clouds of
rock, dust and debris blasted out of the ground zero landing spot, onto
the surrounding terrain, and the dust would also have fallen back onto the
Lander itself. In the published NASA photo's, the soil beneath the Lander
is UNDISTURBED, with NO RETRO-BLAST CRATER, the surrounding rocks have NO
DUST whatsoever, and the Lander is squeaky clean. One photo even shows a
"footprint" beneath the Lander!
(Oh, those clumsy
set technicians again!)
12. The moon
horizon in the NASA published photo's is not sharp and distinct. The pure
vacuum on the moon would have no atmosphere to cause a fuzzy, indistinct
line. However, this is exactly the kind of horizon one gets in an Earth
photo.
13. The helmet
visors of the Astro-Nots have many unexplained bright light sources (that
could not be the Sun), and weird shapes. No explanations have ever been
forthcoming from NASA.
14. The electric
vehicle the Astro-Nots used to travel about, was over ten feet long. The
storage space in the side of the Lander measures five feet in length. No
pictures exist of the vehicle being removed from the Lander.
(I wonder why?)
15. Data is
collected daily by NASA, the Naval Observatory, and NOAA, regarding Solar
flares of the Sun, and radiation on a systematic and regular basis, for
UHF, Radio, Television, Navigation, and Satellite monitoring purposes.
High solar activity would produce dangerous, DEADLY RADIATION to any space
activity, interrupt radio communications, and be deadly to men working on
the Moons suface without any atmospheric protection, or the Van Allen
Belts.
ALL SOLAR
RADIATION DATA for the exact dates of the Lunar missions is UN-AVAILABLE!
UN-AVAILABLE FROM
ANY SOURCE!
16. The photo's
supposedly taken inside the Lander while on the Moon, have no rocket
engine protruding into the inside area. The Lander on display at the
Smithsonian shows the rocket engine nozzle at the bottom of the lander,
with the rocket motor itself supposedly protruding up into the INSIDE THE
LANDER.
17. The NASA sound
track (July 1969), played to audiences around the world, of the Lander
descending and the voice of Neil Armstrong reading out the changing
altitude to "control", as the Lander "descends", has
NO SOUNDS of any rocket engine whatsoever, when he supposedly was within
feet of a rocket engine, inside of the very capsule which supposedly also
enclosed the main engine, (without mufflers folk's) producing THOUSANDS OF
POUNDS OF ROCKET THRUST (RAW POWER)!
A Rocket engine is
a CONTROLLED EXPLOSION.
A Rocket engine is
one of the HIGHEST DECIBEL SOUND LEVEL DEVICES EVER MADE BY MAN!
18. In one of the
published NASA photo's, a rock in the foreground has the letter
"C" clearly etched into the surface. Is this a "prop",
accidentally turned to expose it's "prop letter"? (could this be
a whistle blower, leaving a message for future debunkers)
19. Scientists and
Historians have repeatedly asked NASA to aim the multi-$billion$ dollar
Hubble Telescope at the Moon, and take pictures of the landing sites from
the Apollo missions. Officials have refused; stating that:
(1) The moon is
too bright, and would damage the scope.
(2) The scope
cannot focus on an object that close.
Astronomy journals
have subsequently published several excellent photo's of the Moon, taken
by the Hubbel Telescope. NASA has "no comment"!
20. The son of
"Gus Grissome", one of the early Astronauts trained for the
Apollo Mission, has stated publicly, that he believes his father was
"murdered", after working many years to determine the cause of
the "mysterious Apollo capsule fire" that killed his father
during testing. Grissome was known by all as fearless man, very outspoken
and unafraid to make his opinion known. He was not a "company
man". He was closer to being a rebel, yet highly qualified. (Was his
and the other Astronauts terrible "death by fire", a warning to
others that their lack of co-operation would be dealt with in the harshest
way possible?) 21. No Astro-NOT has ever been diagnosed with Leukemia,
Cancer, or effects of radiation sickness, hair loss or physical
debilitation, immune system failure, which would result from long exposure
to high radiation, and X-Rays, Gamma Rays, or Solar Flare radiation. 22.
Billy Kaysing says he would not be inclined to settle his pending lawsuit
against former astronaut James Lovell because his "goal is to reveal
to the American public that the government lies about important
things." "They lie to us, they cheat us, and I want to open the
lid to Pandora's box," he said in an early June telephone interview.
"I want only to appear in court without any attorney, on my own in
front of a jury, and present my complete case." Kaysing, a former
technical writer for Rocketdyne, a California corporation that worked on
rocket engines for the Lunar Module (known as the LEM) which supposedly
landed on the moon six times between 1969-72, and author of "We Never
Went To The Moon" filed a malicious libel suit against Apollo
astronaut James Lovell last August because Lovell called him a
"wacko" in an article which appeared in San Jose's "Metro
Weekly Magazine" 23. A Nashville, Tenn. producer is currently working
on a video but thus far has been unsuccessful in getting Neil Armstrong to
answer some lingering questions, Kaysing said. "The first time he got
turned away, and the second time, Neil told him if he came back again he
would get arrested." Kaysing said. (If the "Moon landing"
were true, why won't Astro-NOTS even allow interviews, except those staged
by the "Mainstream Media" (and the pre-arranged questions),
after 30 YEARS! If the event actually happened, wouldn't these few men on
the earth who supposedly have had the most unique experience in the
history of the world, be more than happy to share their memories for
professional writers and filmmakers, and the general public? The strange
facts are that they would rather call the Police, than even speak to
"those other" writers, filmmakers or the public. This is akin to
the baseball star "Mark McGuire", after hitting 70 homeruns, and
smashing the 35 year old record of Rodger Maris and Babe Ruth, giving the
fans and admiring kids the finger, refusing to speak to anyone and calling
the police! However, McGuire has always been a cheerful, friendly
gentleman, giving fans and the press, his time and patience. Haven't you
ever wondered how and why "Superhero" Neil Armstrong has
remained out of public scrutiny for 30 years? What are you hiding Neil? Is
your conscience bothering you, maybe just a little bit? Afraid of
questions, Neil?) 24. "Was It Only A Paper Moon?" This 2-hour
report by James Collier, author of "VOTESCAM: The Stealing of
America" includes new evidence videoed in the Johnson Space Center in
Houston -- and questions whether NASA was guilty of spending billions of
taxpayer money -- to stage the greatest theatrical hoax of all time. This
video demands answers from the U.S. Government before we go to Mars.
"Was It Only A Paper Moon?" -- $9.95 Grade-A Productions 270
Sparta Ave 104-234 Sparta, NJ 07871 25. These facts regarding the physical
problems, radiation problems, light angles, photo incongruities, Solar
radiation missing records, Thermo-dynamics of cooling, sound recording
anomalies, common sense questions, observations, and the strange behavior
of the public Astro-NOTS, are only a partial list of questions posed by
Physicists, Photographers, Engineers, writers, and the public, for thirty
years. Questions, that remain UNANSWERED by NASA, or any of the Astro-NOTS
to this day. 26. If the representatives of the United States government,
NASA, and the Astro-NOTS have stonewalled for thirty years, the American
public DOES INDEED know the true answer to these questions. Truth and lies
are not compatible, and by their silence and inability to speak
truthfully, directly and clearly to these and other anomalies, U.S.
Government once again shows it's true face: lies, lies and more lies. Lies
cannot bear the light of scrutiny. The "Moon Landing" was
indeed, a giant fraud and deception, executed on film and sound recording
equipment, with some very expensive "props". That is all the
evidence that exists, to create the "fact" firmly in the public
mind. 27. Happy 30th. Anniversary, you posturing, smirking, lying,
"Apollo ASTRO-NOTS". 28. "You can fool all of the people,
some of the time, and you can fool some of the people all of the time,
......... 29. All names, missions, landing sites, and events in the Apollo
Space Program, echo OCCULT METAPHORS, RITUALS, AND SYMBOLOGY OF PAGAN
RELIGION. The name "APOLLO", is the sun God "Osiris".
30. Listen up America! It's Thirty Billion $dollar$ down the black hole of
NASA and the CIA, for their OCCULT RELIGION, and this RELIGION IS THE NEW
WORLD ORDER!
NASA Update!!
I asked by e-mail, my 40 year long friend at NASA, a JPL Pasadena
space program engineer, government world traveled official (Russia,
England, Germany, Spain, etc. ) a few questions about the "Moon
trip!"
Me:
How were the suits cooled, since the atmosphere was a VACUUM, and
WHERE and or HOW was the HEAT transferred from the suit? You know, how
would you get your refrigerator to work if the radiator was enclosed in a
vacuum chamber?
JPL: Good question John, however I don't have a clue. Try some of
the official NASA sights.
--
Me: Did NASA ever put animals i.e., monkeys or chimps into orbit to
test the danger of passing through the KNOWN High radiation danger of the
Van Allen Belt?
JPL: No, never.
---
Me: Did NASA ever put animals i.e., monkeys or chimps into orbit
OUTSIDE the Van Allen Belt, to determine the danger of Solar Flares, and
cosmic radiation on living organisms?
JPL: No, never.
---
Me: How were the astronaughts able to protect themselves if a SOLAR
FLARES or ERUPTION happened while they were on the Moon, or traveling to
or from? They made six round trips between 1969 and 1972!
JPL: There have been no flights above the belts with organisms from
the U.S. Lots of unmanned flights have taken radiation data (electrons,
protons, and ions ("cosmic rays")) inside and outside the belts.
So, we understand the nominal environment reasonably well. Probably the
largest dose to the astronauts occurred when passing through the belts on
the way to the moon. This is true only if there are no solar flares or
ejections of high energy particles. If there are flares,etc.; people are
in big trouble. They were watching the sun closely as part of the launch
philosophy and they lucked out. There is still no way to predict well what
the sun will do. In fact, the station will have a "safe room"
built into it to "hide" if there is a flare. This has also been
identified as a big deal for the manned mars missions of the future.
--------------
Here are the answers given to me by a 35 year mechanical engineer
(personal friend for 40 years), at JPL, who is sent all over the world by
NASA, has lived in Virginia for two years doing duty on Federal liaison
work with major world contractors in the US, Spain, Russia, France,
England and Germany.
I love it! "as part of the launch philosophy, and they just
lucked out"
---------
The more questions I asked, the crazier it gets! Not ONE SINGLE
INTELLIGENT answer. Just a lot of blah, blah!
|